Coding Agents
Secure Your Coding Agents - From Server to Prompt
Coding agents run with deep access to your systems. EDAMAME Posture gives you two paths: harden the server with the CLI, or let the agent self-certify its behavior through MCP. The agent proves what it did. You verify the proof. Trust that’s earned, not imposed.
The Challenge
Coding Agents Are Powerful. And Exposed.
Coding agents like Cursor, Claude Code, and OpenClaw execute shell commands, access credentials, install packages, and modify system configurations autonomously. They are among the most privileged processes on your workstation or server. Their attack surface is specific and growing.
Prompt Injection and Goal Drift
The agent ingests external content -- a GitHub issue, a docs page, a Slack message. Hidden instructions hijack future tool calls. The agent appears to work normally while exfiltrating data.
Tool and Supply-Chain Poisoning
Malicious MCP servers, plugins, or dependency updates introduce hostile behavior. A poisoned tool does not even need to be called -- loading it into context is sufficient to alter the agent's decisions.
Credential and Identity Exposure
Agents access tokens, SSH keys, cloud credentials, and .env files. If those credentials already appear in breach datasets, the blast radius of any compromise multiplies.
Two Modes
Two Integration Paths for Coding Agent Security
EDAMAME Posture offers two complementary approaches to secure your coding agents. Choose one or combine both for defense in depth.
Harden the Server Running Your Agent
Deploy EDAMAME Posture CLI on the server or workstation hosting your coding agent -- the same way you would secure a self-hosted CI/CD runner.
• Continuous posture monitoring and scoring
• Automated hardening with agentic remediation
• L7 traffic analysis and LAN scanning
• Human-in-the-loop escalation via Slack
Let the Agent Prove Itself
Connect your coding agent to EDAMAME Posture via MCP. The agent self-certifies by cross-referencing intent against system behavior.
• Two-plane security: reasoning vs. system truth
• Traffic divergence detection in real time
• Posture drift alerts with before/after evidence
• MCP integration for self-monitoring agents
Server Security
Harden the Server Running Your Agent
Deploy EDAMAME Posture CLI on the server or workstation hosting your coding agent -- the same way you would secure a self-hosted CI/CD runner. Continuous posture monitoring, automated hardening, and human-in-the-loop escalation via Slack keep the foundation secure while the agent works.
Continuous Posture Monitoring
System hardening checks run continuously: firewall state, disk encryption, OS patches, remote access configuration, endpoint protection status. Every finding is scored and prioritized.
Agentic Remediation with Slack Escalation
In agentic mode, the CLI remediates safe issues automatically and escalates risky ones to your Slack channel. Decisions are logged, transparent, and reversible. Human stays in the loop.
Traffic and Network Visibility
L7 process attribution links every network session to the exact process generating it. ML anomaly detection flags statistical outliers. LAN scanning with CVE correlation surfaces exposed services and vulnerable neighbors.
Agentic Security
Let the Agent Prove Itself
Connect your coding agent to EDAMAME Posture via MCP. The agent self-certifies by cross-referencing its declared intent against actual system behavior. When intent and reality diverge, the agent produces evidence of the mismatch—giving you confidence to delegate more, or take back control when needed.
Two-Plane Security Model
Correlate reasoning-plane intent (what the agent decided) with system-plane effects (what the machine did). Process events, network connections, file writes, and identity access are the ground truth.
Traffic Divergence Detection
The agent says it is summarizing a document, but EDAMAME Posture reports new outbound connections from the agent's process tree to unfamiliar infrastructure. The skill flags it and notifies you immediately.
Posture Drift Alerts
The agent claims it only modified a config file, but firewall state changed, a new remote access service appeared, or endpoint protection was disabled. Before-and-after evidence is surfaced with clear next steps.
