Agent Security
Runtime security for Cursor, Claude Code, and OpenClaw
Harden the host, monitor the agent, and catch mismatches between declared intent and observed system behavior.

Why runtime verification
Static hardening matters. Runtime verification is missing.
A coding agent can still drift from its declared task during normal execution. The missing layer is runtime verification: compare what the agent says it is doing with what the machine actually does.
Static setup is not enough
Signed tools, sandboxing, local MCP binding, and tight scopes reduce exposure before runtime. They do not fully describe behavior once the agent starts working.
Runtime drift still happens
An agent can read external content, use allowed tools, or load a poisoned plugin and still stay inside the nominal setup while moving away from the original task.
System truth closes the gap
Unexpected traffic, new processes, file changes, or posture drift are the host-side ground truth. That is what makes mismatches visible.
Two paths
Start with host trust. Add runtime verification.
EDAMAME splits the problem into two practical layers: secure the runner, server, or workstation first, then add self-monitoring when the agent can participate through MCP.
Harden the runner or agent host
Use EDAMAME Posture on CI/CD runners, servers, and self-hosted agent environments such as OpenClaw. Build trust at the host layer before the agent starts operating.
• Continuous posture monitoring and scoring
• Automated hardening and policy gates
• L7 traffic visibility and escalation
• Strong foundation for self-hosted agents
Let the agent prove itself
When the integration can surface intent through MCP, EDAMAME compares that declared task with live system behavior and highlights drift.
• Intent plane: what the agent says it is doing
• System truth: what the machine actually does
• Traffic and posture drift evidence
• MCP-aware runtime verification
Self-hosted agents
Secure runners, build hosts, and OpenClaw servers
EDAMAME Posture secures the infrastructure behind agentic work: CI/CD runners, isolated VMs, and self-hosted coding-agent hosts. Start by hardening the host, then layer on runtime monitoring where the agent surface supports it.
Runner and build-host hardening
Patch, firewall, encryption, remote-access, and endpoint checks keep build infrastructure trustworthy before secrets or repositories are touched.
OpenClaw-ready host posture
Use the same CLI and posture controls on self-hosted OpenClaw servers and isolated agent VMs before layering on runtime monitoring.
Traffic, L7, and escalation
Process-attributed traffic, anomaly detection, and human-in-the-loop escalation help security teams inspect risky behavior without guessing.
Choose your surface
Secure the agent surface you use today
Use EDAMAME where the work actually happens: on the developer workstation with Cursor or Claude Code, or on self-hosted infrastructure with OpenClaw and EDAMAME Posture.
Secure Cursor on the developer workstation
Add runtime visibility to local coding sessions, detect unexpected traffic or posture drift, and keep developer autonomy intact with EDAMAME Security as the local trust anchor.
Bring runtime monitoring to Claude Code
Use the Claude Code integration to add workstation-level monitoring to local coding sessions while keeping the workflow lightweight and plugin-friendly.
Protect self-hosted OpenClaw environments
Harden servers and VMs with EDAMAME Posture, then add MCP-aware runtime monitoring through the OpenClaw package, plugin bundle, and provisioning flow.

